Evansville Vanderburgh Public Library

Between the icon and the idol, the human person and the modern state in Russian literature and thought-- Chaadayev, Soloviev, Grossman

Label
Between the icon and the idol, the human person and the modern state in Russian literature and thought-- Chaadayev, Soloviev, Grossman
Language
eng
Index
no index present
Literary Form
non fiction
Main title
Between the icon and the idol
Nature of contents
dictionaries
Series statement
Theopolitical visions, 16
Sub title
the human person and the modern state in Russian literature and thought-- Chaadayev, Soloviev, Grossman
Summary
The totalitarian state clearly intends to eliminate all those forms of organic community that rival the absolute loyalty of the individual to the state. This god is a jealous god. . . . Mrowczynski-Van Allen's diagnosis is therefore no less relevant after the fall of the Berlin Wall. And his proposed cure is no less salutary. He appeals to the work of Grossman and other voices from the East to oppose the idolatry of the deified self with the icon, which opens up a distance in which giving and forgiving can occur. Eastern voices are so helpful because they refuse to quarantine theological questions; the borders between theology, politics, and literature are fluid and porous, because they are all a part of an integrated life. The holism of totalitarianism must be opposed by another kind of holism that replaces the idol with the icon. At the same time, the aspiration of secularism to separate politics from theology, and power from love, must be opposed by a politics based on an opening of human persons to God and to each other, the kind of self-donation found in Grossman, and for Christians, on the Cross
Target audience
adult
Classification
Content